5. The Preamble to Aristotle's Metaphysics: Knowledge, Wonder, and Wisdom
Summary
This lecture examines Aristotle’s preamble to the Metaphysics, focusing on why all men by nature desire to know and how this desire leads to wisdom. Berquist explores the role of the senses—especially sight—in revealing our natural inclination toward knowledge for its own sake, distinguishes between knowing that something is so versus knowing why, and demonstrates how wonder progresses from sensible things to the pursuit of first causes. The lecture emphasizes the structure of the preamble and its function in preparing readers for the investigation of wisdom as the highest form of knowledge.
Listen to Lecture
Subscribe in Podcast App | Download Transcript
Lecture Notes
Main Topics #
The Natural Desire to Know #
- All men by nature desire to know (intelligere—to understand, not merely sensory knowledge)
- Knowledge is a real good because it is naturally desired by all men
- This natural inclination distinguishes wisdom from merely useful or practical knowledge
- The good is what all desire; if knowledge is naturally desired, it is an actual good
The Role of the Senses in Knowledge #
- Sight as the primary sense for knowledge: We choose to see before all other senses, not only for practical purposes but “not aiming at doing anything”
- The eye shows us differences and reveals many things
- We use senses for making and doing, but also for knowing itself—the latter demonstrates knowledge as an end in itself
- Example: A beautiful sunset or view is chosen for its own sake, not for utility
The Structure of the Preamble #
- Thomas divides Aristotle’s preamble into two main parts:
- First two readings: Show what the goal of wisdom is
- Third reading: Discuss the kind of knowledge wisdom is
- Aristotle’s epilogue recalls these same points in reverse order
- This structure mirrors the prologue and play division (like Romeo and Juliet’s prologue to the main text)
Experience vs. Knowledge of Universals #
- Experience (empeiria): Knowledge of singulars; knowing that something is so
- Art/Science: Knowledge of universals and causes; knowing why something is so
- Example: One doctor suspects illness; another diagnoses the cause—the latter is wiser because more certain about causation
- The man of art is wiser than the man of mere experience
The Natural Road of Knowledge #
- Progression: Sensation → Memory → Experience → Knowledge of the Universal
- Sensation is immediate and certain but least universal; comes before memory in time
- Memory is more universal than sensation but less certain than sensation itself
- Experience unifies many memories; a higher form of knowledge than singular memory
- Knowledge of the Universal transcends particular cases and grasps why something is so
- Each stage depends on the previous one; each is superior in some respect
On Certainty and Universality #
- Sensation is more certain (less subject to error) but less universal
- Memory is less certain than sensation (people’s accounts of past events diverge over time)
- Experience is more universal than sensation but less universal than knowledge of causes
- The question arises: Which is “better”—sensing face-to-face or remembering? The direct experience is superior despite memory being more universal
The Dependence on Other Minds #
- Aristotle recalls predecessors not from pride but to show insufficiency in their positions
- One develops thinking by arguing against defects in others’ positions
- This contrasts with modern philosophers who often reject ancients without recalling their reasons
- Thomas shows how to recall opinions justly, refute positions fairly, and refute arguments—this is the proper way of philosophical investigation
Wonder and the Pursuit of Causes #
- Wonder leads to philosophy and the pursuit of causes
- The rainbow as example: unites heaven and earth, leads to wonder about causes
- Wonder arises from not knowing why things are so
- The investigation of causes—and philosophy itself—also unites heaven and earth (the visible and invisible orders)
Reason as Ordering and Divine #
- God-like reason: “God-like reason” (from Shakespeare) suggests something divine about reason itself
- If God is the source of all order, and order means “before and after,” then reason—which “looks before and after”—participates in something divine
- Quote: “The things which are from God are ordered” (St. Paul, Epistle to the Romans)
- Reason is characterized by distinguishing and ordering what is distinguished
- This reflects Anaxagoras’s claim that mind (nous) separates things and orders them
Key Arguments #
Why the Preamble Begins with “All Men Desire to Know” #
- Establishes knowledge as a natural good, not merely instrumental
- Shows the desire for knowledge is inherent to human nature
- Prepares the reader to understand wisdom as the fulfillment of this natural desire
- If all men desire knowledge by nature, then investigating wisdom is pursuing a real human good
The Priority of Sight Among the Senses #
- Sight is chosen “before all the others”
- We can use sight “not aiming at doing anything”—revealing knowledge as distinct from utility
- Sight shows us differences and reveals the nature of things
- Therefore, sight is the sense most suited to the pursuit of wisdom
Why Modern Philosophy Lacks the Proper Method #
- Modern philosophers often begin by rejecting ancients without recalling their arguments
- This approach lacks humility and proper philosophical method
- It resembles the devil’s pride (per John of Avila)
- Proper method requires showing the insufficiency of predecessors’ positions through careful refutation, not mere rejection
Important Definitions #
Intelligere (Understanding) #
- Not mere sensory knowing (sensus) but grasping with understanding
- The proper operation of reason
- What all men by nature desire
- Distinguished from practical knowledge (making or doing)
Experience (Empeiria) #
- Knowledge of singulars unified through memory
- Knowing that something is so (e.g., “this remedy helped Callias”)
- More universal than sensation but inferior to knowledge of universal causes
Art/Science (Techne/Episteme) #
- Knowledge of universals and causes
- Knowing why something is so
- Superior to experience in understanding
- Can be taught and transmitted
Wisdom in the Preamble Context #
- The highest perfection of reason
- Sought for its own sake, not for utility (speculative)
- Requires investigating first causes
- Involves understanding why things are so, not merely that they are so
The Preamble (Premium) #
- The introductory section that shows:
- What the goal (desirability) of wisdom is
- The kind of knowledge wisdom is
- Functions like a prologue or overture, preparing the reader
- Must be taken seriously as it reveals the author’s intention
Examples & Illustrations #
Sight and Desire for Knowledge #
- A beautiful sunset: chosen for its own sake, not for any practical purpose
- Buying a house for its view: the view is the primary reason, independent of utility
- Traveling to see locations: we often travel just to see things (Hebrides, scenic locations), not to do anything there
- The young student interested in astronomy: took out astronomy books from the library to understand the stars, not to use that knowledge for practical purposes
Experience vs. Knowledge of Causes #
- Doctor diagnosing: One doctor suspects something is wrong and calls a specialist; the specialist is wiser because more certain about the cause
- Tea brewing: By experience, leaving tea too long makes it taste bad; by science, one knows why (specific chemicals released at different temperatures)
- Making popcorn: Repeated trial and error leads eventually to understanding universal principles of moisture and heat
The Hierarchy of Certainty and Universality #
- Eyewitness testimony: Immediately certain but subject to error over time
- Accident accounts: People’s recollection diverges significantly after two weeks versus immediately after the event
- Seeing a friend face-to-face versus remembering: Direct sensation is superior even though memory is more universal
- Hearing Mozart’s Don Giovanni live versus hearing it on CD: The direct experience is incomparably better
Wonder Leading to Investigation #
- The rainbow after rain: Unites heaven and earth, inspires wonder, leads to questioning about causes and meaning
- Connection to Socrates via Thales: Wonder (thaumazein) is the genealogy of the rainbow—wonder leads to philosophy
- Theological resonance: The rainbow as sign of reconciliation (Genesis) connects to wonder’s role in pursuing causes
Questions Addressed #
Why does Aristotle begin with “All men by nature desire to know”? #
- Establishes knowledge as a real, natural good
- Grounds the entire investigation in human nature
- Shows that wisdom is not merely useful but desired for itself
- Justifies the effort of philosophical investigation
Why is sight privileged among the senses? #
- Sight can be exercised for knowledge alone, not merely for practical purposes
- Sight reveals the most differences and shows the nature of things
- We are willing to choose sight and endure hardship just to see (travel, leisure for viewing)
- Therefore, sight most clearly reveals our natural desire to know for its own sake
How should philosophers relate to their predecessors? #
- By recalling what they said and why they said it
- By carefully showing the insufficiency of their positions
- Not by rejecting them out of pride without understanding their reasons
- By developing one’s own thinking through respectful argument against defects
What makes one knowledge superior to another? #
- Being about a better or more universal thing
- Being more certain in its grasp
- Knowing the cause rather than merely that something is so
- Being able to teach and explain why
How do sensation and memory relate in knowing? #
- In time: Sensation comes before memory
- In necessity: Memory cannot exist without sensation; sensation can exist without memory
- In superiority: Sensation is more certain; memory is more universal
- The paradox: Direct sensation (face-to-face) is superior even though memory transcends the particular
Connections to Thomistic Method #
The Importance of the Preamble #
- Thomas’s teacher Monsignor Dionne taught an entire course on what a preamble is, using this preamble as the primary example
- Dionne emphasized that Aristotle’s prembles (and Thomas’s own) are not like modern prefaces—they demand serious attention
- The preamble is so significant that one lecture on it can expand into multiple sessions
- Understanding the preamble’s structure and arguments is essential for reading the entire work properly