11. The Pre-Socratics: From Matter to Form to Mover
Summary
This lecture traces the development of early Greek philosophy from Thales through Heraclitus, examining how successive thinkers progressively discover different kinds of causes: matter (Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes), form (Pythagoras), and mover/change (Heraclitus). Berquist shows how these philosophers improve upon one another’s guesses about the beginning of all things, moving from water to the unlimited to air, and introduces the critical insight that nature is fundamentally about change between contraries.
Listen to Lecture
Subscribe in Podcast App | Download Transcript
Lecture Notes
Main Topics #
The Three Milesian Philosophers #
Thales: Water as the Beginning
- Water is essential to life (seeds require water to germinate)
- Water can exist in three states: solid (ice), liquid, gaseous (steam)
- Water appears formless and colorless, capable of taking on all qualities
- Reasonable first guess, but water has definite qualities (wet, cold) that limit it
Anaximander: The Unlimited (apeiron)
- Refines Thales by observing: if water is the beginning, how do hot and dry things exist?
- The first matter must be unlimited in quality (not restricted to any definite qualities)
- The first matter must be unlimited in quantity (source never exhausted)
- What is the beginning is also that into which things return (circular principle)
- The unlimited is everlasting, immortal, indestructible
- Problem: The unlimited is described only negatively; we cannot sense it directly
Anaximenes: Air as the Beginning
- Air is more unlimited than water in both quantitative and qualitative senses
- Air is finer and thinner than water—it penetrates where water cannot
- The soul is air, holding the body together; air surrounds and holds the whole world
- Three reasons air is better than water:
- More unlimited quantitatively (fills more space)
- More unlimited qualitatively (fewer definite qualities)
- Thinner in its parts (composite things are made from thinner constituents)
- More sensible than the unlimited, yet still incorporates Anaximander’s insight
Pythagoras and Form as a Cause #
- Approaches natural philosophy from mathematics rather than observation
- Discovers the octave (διάπασον/diapason in Greek) corresponds to the ratio 2:1
- Suggests simple numbers and ratios underlie all things
- Introduces form as a distinct kind of cause from matter
- Examples of form as cause:
- Manhattan cocktail: requires proper ratio of rye whiskey to sweet vermouth (2:1)
- Stinger: brandy and white crème de menthe in ratio 2:1; wrong ratio makes it too sweet
- Carbon dioxide vs. carbon monoxide: differ only in atomic ratio; CO is lethal, CO₂ is in sodas
- Carries the mathematical habit of looking for form/ratio over into natural philosophy
Heraclitus: Change, Contraries, and Fire #
Change as Fundamental #
- Reality is like a river: always flowing, never the same water twice
- Cratylus (student of Heraclitus) allegedly claimed you cannot step even once into the same river
- Change occurs between contraries: cold becomes hot, wet becomes dry, living becomes dead, awake becomes asleep
- The sun is new every day—constantly changing like all things
Nature Loves to Hide #
- Nature (φύσις/physis) originally means birth—what comes from within, hidden
- The baby is hidden within the mother; the source (nature) is always within, not visible on the surface
- This is why nature loves to hide: it is the interior cause, not the exterior manifestation
- The outward appearance is known; what generates it remains hidden
Apparent Contradiction in Change #
- If something “becomes” hot from cold, does the cold become hot (logical contradiction)?
- If not, then there is no change
- Heraclitus seems to suggest: things both are and are not simultaneously
- Example: We are and we are not the same persons from week to week (we have changed)
- Yet we remain somehow the same (same teacher, same students)
- Later philosophers respond differently:
- Parmenides: Rejects change as impossible due to contradiction
- Plato and Aristotle: Untie the apparent contradiction; they understand change properly
- Hegelians and Marxists: Accept real contradiction in things (dialectics)
Fire as First Matter and Mover #
- “All things are exchanged for fire and fire for all things”
- Fire is volatile and constantly transforming—excellent for representing the mover
- Fire has definite qualities (hot, dry), making it less ideal as first matter than air
- Heraclitus may confusedly identify matter and mover; later philosophers will separate these clearly
Hidden Harmony and Opposition #
- “The hidden harmony is better than the apparent”
- Contraries work together: the bow and lyre accomplish their function through opposing forces
- Opposition is not destructive but productive: competition drives improvement, legal systems use opposing arguments, character develops through struggle
The Way Up and Down #
- “The way up and down is one and the same”
- Earth becomes water, water becomes air, air becomes fire (and the reverse)
- “The death of earth is water coming to be”
- The universe is eternal fire, kindled and extinguished in measures
- Beginning and end are the same in a circle
Logos and the Cosmos #
- “It is wise, listening not to me but to reason, to agree that all things are one”
- Reason (λόγος/logos) naturally seeks unity and order
- The cosmos (κόσμος—a beautiful, well-ordered whole) appears ordered, not a random heap
- A mindless fire would produce “a heap piled up at random”
- The order and beauty suggest an intelligent mind behind the universe
- This anticipates Anaxagoras’s concept of Mind (Νοῦς/Nous)
Key Arguments #
Why Look for One Simple Beginning? #
- Reason naturally seeks order; order is based on something one
- Historical events are ordered by reference to one pivotal event (e.g., birth of Christ)
- An army requires one leader; a nation requires one supreme government
- Scientists seek unity in equations and laws
How the First Matter Must Be Constituted #
- Must be simple, not composite (else something precedes it)
- Must have no definite qualities (else contrary qualities would be excluded from the universe)
- Must be unlimited in quantity (inexhaustible source for all things)
- Must be unlimited in quality (free from restriction to any definite qualities)
Why Air is Better Than Water #
- More unlimited quantitatively: Air fills more space and penetrates further
- More unlimited qualitatively: Air has fewer definite qualities than water
- Finer and thinner: Composite things are made from thinner constituents (thick book from thin pages; molecules from atoms; atoms from particles)
The Problem of Sensibility vs. Intelligibility #
- The unlimited (ἄπειρον/apeiron) is intelligible but not sensible—described only negatively
- Water and air are sensible but have definite qualities that limit their role as first matter
- Anaximenes seeks a middle ground: air is less sensible than water but more sensible than the unlimited, yet still captures the insight that first matter is unlimited
Important Definitions #
Cause (αἴτιον/aition) #
- That which is responsible for the being or becoming of another thing
- Greek meaning is tied to “responsible” or “responsible for”
- Four kinds: matter, form, mover (maker), end
Nature (φύσις/physis) #
- Originally: birth (from root meaning to be born)
- Extended: the source of birth within a thing (the mother as nature, the seed as nature)
- Further extended: any cause of motion and rest within a thing
- Finally: what a thing is (its essence)
- Always implies something within, hidden from external view
First Matter (ὕλη/hyle) #
- That from which all other things come to be
- Must be simple and without definite qualities
- Must be unlimited in both quantity and quality
- Examples guessed: water, the unlimited, air
The Unlimited (ἄπειρον/apeiron) #
- Not limited in quality (free from any single definite set of qualities)
- Not limited in quantity (inexhaustible)
- Everlasting, immortal, indestructible
- Can only be described negatively; not directly sensible
Form (μορφή/morphe) #
- In this context (Pythagoras): ratio, order, arrangement
- Not merely shape, but the principle that organizes matter
- Example: the ratio 2:1 that makes a Manhattan or stinger what it is
Cosmos (κόσμος/kosmos) #
- Greek word for universe
- Implies something beautiful, well-arranged, well-ordered
- Contrasts with a heap piled up at random
Examples & Illustrations #
The Word “Cat” #
- Matter cause: Depends on letters C, A, T
- Form cause: Depends on their order (distinguishes “cat” from “act”)
- Mover cause: Depends on the writer who arranged the letters
- End cause: Made for the purpose of naming the animal
- Demonstrates how one thing depends on multiple kinds of causes simultaneously
The Chair #
- Matter: Wood and screws
- Form: The shape that makes it a chair (not a roof)
- Mover: The carpenter who shaped it
- End: Made for sitting
The Cocktails #
- Manhattan: Rye whiskey + sweet vermouth in 2:1 ratio
- Stinger: Brandy + white crème de menthe in 2:1 ratio
- Same matter (spirit + liqueur), different form (different substances); same form (2:1 ratio) with different matter produces different drinks
- Wrong ratio makes the drink too sweet and cloying
Water Penetration #
- Water can go through basement walls where soil cannot
- Air penetrates where water cannot
- Demonstrates how air is finer and thinner, hence better suited to be the unlimited first matter
The River and Change #
- Not the same water twice (demonstrating impermanence)
- Yet called “the same river” (demonstrating that some identity persists despite change)
- Illustrates the puzzle: we are and we are not the same from week to week
The Box and the Chest (from Sherlock Holmes) #
- An empty chest: “there’s nothing in there”
- Yet air fills it, though we cannot see the air
- Demonstrates that air’s invisibility makes us overlook its existence
- Suggests how the first matter, being finer, is harder to perceive
The Bow and Lyre #
- Hands pull in opposite directions
- Yet opposites work together harmoniously to create the desired effect
- Illustration of how hidden harmony emerges from apparent opposition
- Example of useful opposition beyond mere static equilibrium
Questions Addressed #
Is it reasonable to look for one beginning of all things? #
- Yes: understanding something from its beginning gives the best understanding
- The human mind naturally inclines toward unity even without explicit reasons for it
Why should the first matter have no definite qualities? #
- If it had hot, it could not produce cold; if wet, it could not produce dry
- But we experience both hot and cold, wet and dry, living and dead
- Therefore the first matter must be formless and qualityless
Is water a good guess for the first matter? #
- Yes, for preliminary reasons: essential to life, appears formless, can take multiple states
- But no, for a deeper reason: it has definite qualities (wet, cold)
Why is air better than water? #
- For three reasons: more unlimited quantitatively, more unlimited qualitatively, finer and thinner
- Finer things compose thicker things, not vice versa
Does Heraclitus really believe day and night are the same thing? #
- Unclear; he may be pointing out the appearance of contradiction to stimulate thinking
- Like Socrates drawing out contradictions to lead the soul toward truth
- Like Thomas Aquinas presenting objections before untying the apparent contradiction
How can opposites work together productively? #
- The bow: opposing forces create the arrow’s flight
- Competition: opposing businesses drive each other to improve
- Law: opposing lawyers seek truth through opposition
- Art: light and shadow create beauty together
- Character: struggle and obstacles develop virtue
Does the cosmos’s order suggest an intelligent cause? #
- Yes: a mindless, random fire would produce “a heap piled up at random”
- The beauty and order we observe suggest an intelligent mind (Νοῦς/Nous)
- This anticipates later philosophy’s move toward recognizing Mind as a cause
Theological and Philosophical Significance #
Development of Causal Thinking #
- Thales and the Milesians begin with matter
- Pythagoras introduces form as a distinct cause
- Heraclitus emphasizes motion and change (mover)
- Later philosophers (Plato, Aristotle) will add the end (final cause)
- This represents the natural development of human reason toward complete causal understanding
Connection to Later Philosophy #
- Plato was taught by Cratylus (student of Heraclitus) and responds to Heraclitus’s emphasis on change by developing the theory of unchanging Forms
- Aristotle examines these predecessors systematically to confirm and refine the doctrine of four causes
- Both Plato and Aristotle “untie” the apparent contradiction in change that Heraclitus seems to accept
- Anaxagoras (not fully discussed here) will introduce Mind (Nous) as cause, suggested by Heraclitus’s observations about cosmic order
Relevance to Thomistic Theology #
- Thomas Aquinas identifies four of the five attributes of God’s substance in pre-Socratic thinking:
- One (Thales sought one beginning)
- Simple (first matter must be simple, not composite)
- Unlimited (Anaximander and Heraclitus)
- Unchanging/Eternal (Anaximander, Heraclitus)
- Perfect (not found in pre-Socratics)
- The method of examining predecessors follows Aristotle’s Metaphysics, which Aquinas saw as the proper way to develop understanding
- The principle that opposition can be productive (from Heraclitus) appears in theological development: God permits evil, conflict develops virtue, the cross overcomes death