90. Wisdom, Slowness, and the Avoidance of Intellectual Stumbling
Summary
Listen to Lecture
Subscribe in Podcast App | Download Transcript
Lecture Notes
Main Topics #
The Nature of Wisdom and Slowness #
- Wisdom (sapientia) derives from sapor (taste) and means sapida scientia—savory knowledge
- Wisdom is characterized by slowness, but this slowness is distinct from:
- Stupidity or dumbness (slowness of the mind)
- Foolish hesitation (being slow to act when one should act)
- The slowness of wisdom is a deliberate, careful lingering—like savoring wine or hard candy
- Wisdom is most exemplified in the knowledge of God, which must be savored, not rushed
Seven Places Where the Wise Proceed Slowly #
Berquist identifies seven contexts requiring deliberate slowness to avoid intellectual stumbling:
When Many Things Must Be Considered Before Judgment
- Example: The Pythagorean theorem (Euclid, Book I, Proposition 47) requires understanding 46 preceding theorems
- In moral decisions, one must weigh all circumstances and situations
- Monsignor Diøn’s analysis of birth control discourse: multiple discourses from theology, philosophy, and science must be considered before judgment
- Most people jump to conclusions without considering all necessary elements
When Something Is Difficult to Know
- Aristotle (Book II of Metaphysics) identifies two causes of difficulty:
- Difficulty in the thing itself: matter, motion, time “hardly are” and are thus difficult to understand
- Difficulty in the weakness of our mind: God is most knowable but least knowable to us due to our weakness; Scripture: “God dwells in light inaccessible”
- Modern philosophers (Descartes, Locke) stumble by dismissing the definition of motion as unnecessary
- If one does not understand motion distinctly, one cannot understand nature (defined by motion) or the argument for the unmoved mover
- Aristotle (Book II of Metaphysics) identifies two causes of difficulty:
When a Small Beginning Has Great Power
- The axioms “It is impossible to be and not be” and “It is necessary to be or not be” are small in size but extend to all knowledge
- A small mistake at the beginning magnifies throughout all subsequent reasoning
- Analogy: taking the wrong road at a fork—little distance at the start becomes great distance later
- Thomas Aquinas’s reputation as the “dumb ox” reflects his careful attention to foundational principles; once he mastered these foundations, he proceeded “in an unstoppable way”
- In theology, mistakes about the Trinity affect all subsequent theological reasoning
When Knowledge Follows a Road
- All knowledge follows a road from senses to reason
- Logic is the common road; each science has its own private road
- One must know the road before following it well
- Aristotle and Plato (in Timaeus) emphasize knowing the road of inquiry
- Modern philosophers often wander rather than follow the right road
When There Is Movement from General to Particular Knowledge
- Must move from confused to distinct knowledge at the level of the general first
- Example: Define triangle in general before descending to equilateral, isosceles, scalene
- Define virtue in general before discussing particular virtues (courage, chastity, etc.)
- Most thinkers jump directly from confused general knowledge to particular knowledge
When Words Are Equivocal by Reason
- Book V of Aristotle’s Metaphysics distinguishes the central meanings of equivocal words
- Common words like ‘in,’ ‘out,’ ‘being,’ ‘one,’ ‘part,’ ‘whole,’ ’end’ are equivocal by reason and carry multiple ordered meanings
- Most people use these words without understanding their multiplicity and hierarchy
- The fallacy of equivocation causes constant stumbling in thinking
- Example: The word ‘run’ has multiple senses—physical motion of legs, action/course, and (by extension through discourse, running of the mind) intellectual operation
When Reading the Words of Wise Men
- Thomas Aquinas: read Aristotle and Augustine “carefully, frequently, and with reverence”
- One never completely unfolds all meaning in the words of Christ or other wise figures
- Example from John’s Gospel: ‘In the beginning was the Word’—this captures profound theological truth that cannot be rushed through
- Shakespeare says things so well they cannot be improved upon
Key Arguments #
The Equation of Stumbling with Abuse #
- Shakespeare: “What revolts from true birth, stumbling on abuse” (Romeo and Juliet, Act 2, Scene 3)
- To stumble is to fall into error by abusing things contrary to their true nature (vera natio, true birth)
- Examples of abuse: misusing hands for drugs, misusing vocal cords for lies, misusing sexual organs
- This principle connects to modern philosophy’s revolt from three natural things: wonder, the natural road of knowledge, and the axioms
Wisdom Characterized by Savoring, Not Speed #
- Opposite of wisdom is not speed but “bitter conduct” and “unsavory guide” (Shakespeare)
- When Romeo hastens to take poison in despair, he calls reason his “desperate pilot” who has run the ship “on the dashing rocks”
- The wise man savors knowledge, lingering over it as one lingers over fine wine or candy
- This is why Augustine and Thomas linger over mysteries like the Trinity—not from confusion but from reverence and understanding
Small Mistakes at the Beginning Multiply Throughout #
- Aristotle and Thomas often state: “Even to make a small mistake in the beginning is a great one in the end”
- This explains why foundational work (like studying the Isagoge of Porphyry) is essential
- Thomas draws upon the Isagoge even in the Summa Contra Gentiles when reasoning about God and creatures
- Modern dismissal of foundational principles (axioms, motion, definition) cascades into errors throughout subsequent philosophy
Important Definitions #
- Wisdom (Sapientia): Sapida scientia — savory knowledge; knowledge that is tasted and lingered over rather than rushed through; characterized by slowness and reverence, especially concerning God
- True Birth (Vera Natio): The essential nature or natural purpose of a thing; to revolt from true birth is to abuse things contrary to their nature and inevitably stumble
- Equivocal by Reason: Words with multiple related meanings that follow a logical order or hierarchy (distinct from equivocal by chance, where meanings are unrelated)
- The Road of Knowledge: The ordered path from sensory perception through reason to intellectual understanding; each science has its own private road; logic is the common road
- Slowness of Wisdom: Deliberate care and lingering in thinking; distinct from stupidity (slowness of the mind) and foolish hesitation (being slow to act when one should act)
Examples & Illustrations #
From Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Act 2, Scene 3 #
- Friar Lawrence’s counsel to Romeo: “Wisely and slow, they stumble that run fast”
- This couples wisdom with slowness while identifying stumbling with haste
- Contrasts with stupidity: there is a slowness of dumbness and a slowness of wisdom
- Comparison: Thomas Aquinas called the “dumb ox” by fellow students; Albert the Great saw his slowness as wisdom, not stupidity
- Romeo’s haste before taking poison: “Come, bitter conduct, come, unsavory guide, thou desperate pilot, now at once run on the dashing rocks thy seasick weary bark”
- Shakespeare illustrates the opposite of wisdom: bitter (not savory), unsavory, desperate
- The pilot (reason) runs the ship on rocks through haste
- Friar Lawrence on plants: “For nought so vile that on the earth doth live, but to the earth some special good doth give”
- Illustrates the principle that all things have their true nature and purpose; abuse revolts from this
From Geometry and Mathematics #
- Euclid’s Pythagorean Theorem: Proposition 47 in Book 1 requires understanding 46 preceding theorems
- Demonstrates why one cannot rush to judgment in geometry
- Shows the ordered nature of mathematical knowledge
From Literature and History #
- Edgar Allan Poe, “The Purloined Letter”: Comparison of great minds and small minds
- Small mind is like a small body: easily set in motion but easily stopped (like a ping-pong ball)
- Great mind is like a large body: difficult to set in motion but, once moving, very difficult to stop
- Great minds are careful about foundational things at the beginning; this patience then allows unstoppable progress
From Church History and Vatican II #
- Monsignor Diøn’s analysis of birth control discourse: He enumerated the various discourses (theological, philosophical, scientific) that must be completed before judgment
- Demonstrates the first place where wise men proceed slowly
- Shows modern tendency to jump to conclusions without considering all necessary elements
Notable Quotes #
“Wisely and slow, they stumble that run fast.” — Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, Act 2, Scene 3
“Come, bitter conduct, come, unsavory guide, thou desperate pilot, now at once run on the dashing rocks thy seasick weary bark.” — Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet
“What revolts from true birth, stumbling on abuse.” — Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, Act 2, Scene 3
“Even to make a small mistake in the beginning is a great one in the end.” — Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas
“With the truth, everything harmonizes.” — Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book 1
“Miserable the man who knows all things but doesn’t know God… Blessed the man who knows God even if he knows nothing else.” — Augustine
“Read Aristotle and Augustine carefully, frequently, and with reverence.” — Thomas Aquinas
Questions Addressed #
What is the relationship between wisdom and slowness? #
- Wisdom necessarily involves slowness because wisdom is sapida scientia—savory knowledge that must be tasted and lingered over
- This slowness is distinct from the slowness of stupidity (a defect of mind) and from foolish hesitation (being slow to act when one should act)
- The wise person savors knowledge, especially of God, and therefore cannot and should not rush
- True wisdom manifests in careful deliberation over many considerations, in patience with things difficult to know, and in reverence for foundational truths
Why do modern philosophers stumble? #
- They reject the natural desire to know (wonder), as Hobbes and Marx explicitly do
- They dismiss the natural road of knowledge without understanding it
- They attack the axioms that ground all reasoning (e.g., Bertrand Russell’s attack on “the whole is greater than the part”)
- They fail to understand words equivocal by reason and use them without grasping their multiple meanings
- They jump from confused general knowledge directly to particular knowledge without proper deliberation
- Examples: Descartes dismisses Aristotle’s definition of motion as unnecessary; Locke claims motion cannot be defined
How does one avoid stumbling in thinking? #
- Proceed slowly when many things must be considered before judgment can be made
- Recognize when something is difficult to know (either in the thing itself or due to the weakness of our mind) and proceed with corresponding care
- Attend carefully to small beginnings that have great power—foundational axioms and principles
- Know the road of knowledge and follow it rather than wandering
- Move deliberately from general to particular knowledge, avoiding premature descent to particulars
- Understand the multiple meanings of equivocal words and their hierarchical ordering
- Read the words of wise men with reverence, care, and lingering attention
Connections to Other Lectures #
- References back to earlier discussion of the definition of motion (Books 6-8 of Physics)
- Connects to the axiom of non-contradiction from Book 4 of Aristotle’s Metaphysics
- Relates to foundational work on predicables from Porphyry’s Isagoge
- Connects wisdom to the contemplative knowledge of God discussed in theology