26. Quality, Modus, and the Four Species of Determination
Summary
This lecture explores how Thomas Aquinas uses the term modus (mode, measure, boundary, limit) to distinguish the four species of quality and their different modes of determining a subject. Berquist examines why Thomas applies modus to quality despite it being associated with quantity, arguing that quality determines the subject according to nature, action/passion, and quantity itself. The lecture addresses the linguistic puzzle of how ‘modus’ and ‘determinatio’ function as synonyms and how measurable things must be limited, connecting this to Shakespeare’s use of ‘immeasurable’ and ‘infinite’ and the Fourth Lateran Council’s terminology for God.
Listen to Lecture
Subscribe in Podcast App | Download Transcript
Lecture Notes
Main Topics #
Thomas Aquinas on Modus and Quality’s Determination #
- Thomas uses modus (mode) and determinatio (determination) as synonyms when distinguishing the four species of quality
- Quality determines a subject in three distinct ways:
- According to nature itself (First Species: Habit and Disposition) — relates to good/bad disposition
- According to action and passion (Second and Third Species: Ability and Undergoing Qualities) — relates to easy/difficult, quick/slow, lasting/transient
- According to quantity (Fourth Species: Figure and Form) — without motion, without the notion of good/bad
The Problem: Why Use Modus for Quality? #
- Modus typically means measure — associated with quantity’s division and limitation
- Species of quantity are distinguished by measure — discrete and continuous are measured differently
- Question: Why should Thomas use modus to distinguish species of quality if quantity is what gets measured?
The Resolution: Modus as Limit/Boundary #
- Modus can also signify boundary or limit
- To be measurable, a quantity must also be limited
- Quality operates as a mode or way of limiting/determining a subject
- This sense aligns with how the word ‘modus’ means ‘way’ — modus predicandi (way of predicating), etc.
The Four Species and Their Modes of Determination #
First Species (Habit/Disposition)
- Determines subject according to nature and the end (what the nature is ordered to)
- Bears the notion of good or bad — you are well or ill-disposed toward your nature
- Can be easily or difficultly moved
- Example: A man with courage disposes him well toward danger; cowardice disposes him ill
Second and Third Species (Ability and Undergoing Quality)
- Determine subject according to action and passion — the principles of action/suffering
- These principles (matter and form) follow from nature
- Bear the notion of good or bad — something is done easily or difficultly, quickly or slowly, lastingly or transiently
- Relate to motion and change
Fourth Species (Figure/Form)
- Determines subject according to quantity alone
- Does not pertain to notions of good/bad (bene/male)
- Does not pertain to quickly or slowly changing (cito vel tarde transiens)
- Example: A square number (64) determined by its quantity, not by motion or value
Why Habit is First Among the Species #
- Though natural ability is more fundamental ontologically, habit is listed first
- Reason: Nature is first considered in a thing
- Habit’s determination relates directly to the end and nature of the thing
- The path to happiness is virtue (habit well-disposed); the path to misery is vice (habit ill-disposed)
- Therefore, what most directly affects human flourishing (good/bad disposition toward nature) is appropriately listed first
Measurability and Immeasurability #
- To be measurable, something must be limited (have boundaries)
- The infinite is described as immeasurable — it has no measure because it has no limit
- Shakespeare uses ‘immeasurable’ and ‘infinite’ almost synonymously in Timon of Athens: “Common mother thou whose womb immeasurable and infinite breast teams and feeds all”
- The Fourth Lateran Council uses immense (immensely) to describe God’s infinity — meaning unlimited
- Connection: Modus as limitation explains why quality (which limits/determines a subject) can be called a mode even though measure typically belongs to quantity
Key Arguments #
Why Thomas Uses Modus for Quality Despite Its Association with Quantity #
- Apparent Problem: Modus means measure; species of quantity are distinguished by measure; therefore modus seems inappropriate for quality
- Solution: Modus has multiple senses:
- Modus as “measure” (primary sense for quantity)
- Modus as “way” or “manner” (how something is done)
- Modus as “limit” or “boundary” (how something is bounded/determined)
- All four species of quality determine or limit the subject in specific ways
- Therefore, modus (as limit/boundary) appropriately describes quality’s operation
The Connection Between Limitation and Measurability #
- What is measurable must have limits/boundaries (otherwise infinite, immeasurable)
- Quality limits or determines the subject according to different principles
- Therefore, quality can be said to operate as a modus (limit/determination)
- This explains why determinatio and modus are used synonymously in Thomas’s treatment
Important Definitions #
- Modus: Mode, way, manner, measure, boundary, or limit — used to describe how quality determines a subject
- Determinatio: Determination; the limiting of a subject according to different principles (nature, action/passion, quantity)
- Dispositio (bene/male): Being well or ill-disposed toward one’s nature
- Immensum (Immense): Used by the Fourth Lateran Council to describe God’s infinity — literally “not measured,” unlimited
- Cito/Tarde: Quickly/slowly — describing how action/passion occur
Examples & Illustrations #
Shakespeare on Measurable/Immeasurable #
- Timon of Athens: “Common mother thou whose womb immeasurable and infinite breast teams and feeds all”
- The womb’s room is described as both immeasurable and infinite — nearly synonymous terms
- Both convey the sense of having no limit, no boundary, no measure
Square Numbers and the Fourth Species #
- 64 is both a square number (8 × 8) and a cube number (4 × 4 × 4)
- These numbers are determined by their quantity and form, not by motion or good/bad
- The fourth species of quality determines by quantity alone, without the notion of motion or value
- The $64 question: cultural reference to 64 being a special number (both square and cube)
The Difference Between “How Much” and “How” #
- When asked about height on a driver’s license: “How tall are you?” → Answer: “Five foot eight” (quantity)
- When asked “How are you today?” → Answer: “I’m sick,” “I’m angry,” “I’m depressed” (quality)
- The word “how” (qualis in Latin) signifies the quality or determination of a thing, not its quantity
- This linguistic distinction reflects the metaphysical difference between how much (quantity) and how (quality)
Questions Addressed #
Why should Thomas use modus to distinguish quality when modus means measure and measure belongs to quantity? #
- Resolution: Modus has multiple senses beyond “measure” — it can mean “way,” “manner,” “limit,” or “boundary”
- Quality operates as a limit or determination of the subject according to different principles
- Therefore, modus (in the sense of “limit/boundary”) appropriately describes quality’s function
- This is why determinatio and modus are used synonymously
How does the fourth species of quality differ from the first three? #
- First three species: Determine subject according to nature, action/passion; relate to good/bad; admit motion
- Fourth species: Determines subject according to quantity alone; does not admit notions of good/bad; does not involve motion
- Example: A geometric shape (figure) is determined purely by its form/quantity; a virtue (habit) is determined by its relation to good/bad and to human nature’s end
What does it mean for something to be “immeasurable” or “infinite”? #
- The immeasurable is that which has no measure because it has no limit
- Shakespeare’s use in Timon of Athens: “immeasurable womb” and “infinite breast” convey the same idea — unlimited, unbounded
- The Fourth Lateran Council’s use of immense (immensely) for God follows the same logic — God is unlimited, beyond all measure
- This concept clarifies why modus (as limit) is essential to understanding quality: quality limits the subject, whereas infinity/immeasurability is the absence of such limitation